References

Moisidis E, Heath T, Boorer C A prospective, blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial of topical negative pressure use in skin grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 114:(4)917-922 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000133168.57199.E1

Kamolz LP, Lumenta DB. Topical negative pressure therapy for skin graft fixation in hand and feet defects: a method for quick and easy dressing application – The “sterile glove technique”. Burns. 2013; 39:(4)814-815 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2012.09.019

Chang KP, Tsai CC, Lin TM An alternative dressing for skin graft immobilization: negative pressure dressing. Burns. 2001; 27:(8)839-842 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-4179(01)00052-3

Han HH, Jun D, Moon SH Fixation of split-thickness skin graft using fast-clotting fibrin glue containing undiluted high-concentration thrombin or sutures: a comparison study. Springerplus. 2016; 5:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3599-x

Buckley RC, Breazeale EE, Edmond JA, Brzezienski MA. A simple preparation of autologous fibrin glue for skin-graft fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 103:(1)202-206 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199901000-00033

Butts CC, Sahawneh J, Duffy A Cost-benefit analysis of outcomes from the use of fibrin sealant for fixation of skin grafts in small-size burns compared to staples as historical controls: a retrospective review. Ann Plast Surg. 2015; 74:(2)173-175 https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000397

Kiliç A, Özdengil E. Skin graft fixation by applying cyanoacrylate without any complication. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 110:(1)370-371 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200207000-00097

Davey RB, Sparnon AL, Lodge M. Technique of split skin graft fixation using hypafix: a 15-year review. ANZ J Surg. 2003; 73:(11)958-962 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02831.x

Cassey JG, Davey RB, Wallis KA. ‘Hypafix’: new technique of skin graft fixation. ANZ J Surg. 1989; 59:(6)479-483 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1989.tb01614.x

Vloemans A, Kreis RW. Fixation of skin grafts with a new silicone rubber dressing (Mepitel). Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1994; 28:(1)75-76 https://doi.org/10.3109/02844319409015999

Yen YH, Lin CM, Hsu H Skin graft fixation using hydrofiber (Aquacel Extra). Ann Plast Surg. 2018; 80:(6)616-621 https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001432

Kim YO, Lee SJ, Park BY, Lee WJ. The tie-over dressing using skin-staples and round rubber bands. Br J Plast Surg. 2005; 58:(5)751-752 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2005.04.004

Cheng LF, Lee JT, Chou TD Experience with elastic rubber bands for the tie-over dressing in skin graft. Burns. 2006; 32:(2)212-215 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2005.08.026

Jo HJ, Kim JS, Kim NG Redoable tie-over dressing using multiple loop silk threads. Arch Plast Surg. 2013; 40:(3)259-262 https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2013.40.3.259

Bektas CI, Kankaya Y, Ozer K A tie-over dressing using a silicone tube to graft deep wounds. Arch Plast Surg. 2013; 40:(6)711-714 https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2013.40.6.711

Matiasek J, Djedovic G, Unger L Outcomes for split-thickness skin transplantation in high-risk patients using octenidine. J Wound Care. 2015; 24 https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2015.24.sup6.s8

Choi JS, Lee JH, Kim SM Hydrogel-impregnated dressings for graft fixation: a case series. J Wound Care. 2015; 24:(7)326-328 https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2015.24.7.326

Armstrong SH, Ruckley CV. Use of a fibrous dressing in exuding leg ulcers. J Wound Care. 1997; 6:(7)322-324

Barnea Y, Amir A, Leshem D Clinical comparative study of Aquacel and paraffin gauze dressing for split-skin donor site treatment. Ann Plast Surg. 2004; 53:(2)132-136 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000112349.42549.b3

A novel method of skin graft fixation using adhesive hydrofiber foam

01 April 2022

Abstract

Objective:

Conventional skin graft fixation uses a tie-over bolus dressing with splint fixation. However, splints are highly uncomfortable and contribute considerably to medical waste. Previous study has shown positive results using hydrofiber for skin graft fixation. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of using adhesive hydrofiber foam for skin graft fixation.

Method:

In this retrospective study, patients reconstructed with split-thickness skin graft that was fixated only with adhesive hydrofiber foam from April 2017 until April 2019 were included.

Results:

A total of 44 patients took part, of whom 32 were male and 12 female, with a mean age of 56±19 years. The mean operative time was 77.5±91 minutes. The average defect size was 42±37cm2. The mean skin graft take was 97±5%. The mean length of hospital admission after skin grafting until discharge was 8.5±9.2 days. Excluding those patients undergoing other procedures at the same time as the skin graft gave a total of 34 patients. Their mean operative time was 32±20 minutes, and mean length of hospital stay after skin grafting was 4.0±4.7 days.

Conclusion:

Adhesive hydrofiber foam for skin graft fixation was technically very easy to apply, resulting in a waterproof, non-bulky, secure dressing. Splints were not required. Patients were allowed to mobilise. This method resulted in increased patient comfort and decreased medical waste. From these findings, we believe that this is an extremely simple and effective method of skin graft fixation.

Skin grafting is a common procedure that is often required for wound repair and reconstruction. The conventional form of skin graft fixation is using a tie-over bolus dressing together with splint fixation. However, these splints are highly uncomfortable and contribute considerably to the amount of medical waste generated.

Many other forms of skin graft fixation have been described. Common methods include negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT),1,2,3 tissue glue,4,5,6,7 Hypafix (a self-adhesive dressing tape, Smith+Nephew, Australia)8,9 and Mepitel (a silicone dressing, Mölnlycke, Sweden).10 However in all these forms of skin graft fixation, it is necessary that the patients be bedbound and rested.

In 2018, we described our method of skin graft fixation using hydrofiber.11 We followed up on this study by using adhesive hydrofiber foam (AHF, Aquacel Foam, ConvaTec, UK) for skin graft fixation. AHF has a similar contact layer using hydrofiber, but contains a secondary absorbent foam layer, as well as an external waterproof layer with a silicone adhesive border. This should provide increased patient comfort as well as ease in wound care, allowing the patient the freedom to take a shower if they so wish. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of this form of skin graft fixation.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Journal of Wound Care's Silk Road Supplement and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for healthcare professionals across Asia. To read more, please register today.