References

Aljehani Y, Al-Matar Z, Nawar S. The application of vacuum-assisted closure device in the management of empyema necessitans. Case Rep Surg. 2016; 2016:1-3 https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6805736

Karapinar K, Metin M, Erdogan S Experience with vacuum-assisted closure in the management of postpneumonectomy empyema: an analysis of eight cases. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015; 64:(03)258-262 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1390505

Abuzaid Z, Aljehani M, Aljehani Y. The application of vacuum-assisted closure device in the management of empyemathoracis. Int J Adv Res (Indore). 2017; 5:(1)1828-1830 https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/2952

Altintas B, Biber R, Brem MH. The accelerating effect of negative pressure wound therapy with Prevena on the healing of a closed wound with persistent serous secretion. Int Wound J. 2015; 12:(6)662-663 https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12198

Groetzner J, Holzer M, Graba M Intrathoracic application of vacuum wound therapy following thoracic surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009; 57:(7)417-420 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1185907

Varker KA, Ng T. Management of empyema cavity with the vacuum-assisted closure device. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006; 81:(2)723-725 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.10.040

Gomes MM, Alves M, Correia JB, Santos L. Empyema necessitans: very late complication of pulmonary tuberculosis. BMJ Case Rep. 2013; 2013 https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-202072

Sziklavari Z, Grosser C, Neu R Minimally invasive vacuum-assisted closure therapy in the management of complex pleural empyema. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013; 17:(1)49-53 https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivt093

Sziklavari Z, Ried M, Zeman F Short-term and long-term outcomes of intrathoracic vacuum therapy of empyema in debilitated patients. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016; 11:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-016-0543-7

Rocco G, Martucci N, La Rocca A Postoperative local morbidity and the use of vacuum-assisted closure after complex chest wall reconstructions with new and conventional materials. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 98:(1)291-296 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.04.022

Sandoz H. Negative pressure wound therapy: clinical utility. Chronic Wound Care Management and Research. 2015; 2:71-79 https://doi.org/10.2147/CWCMR.S48885

De Caridi G, Serra R, Massara M VAC therapy for the treatment of complex wounds after cardio-thoracic surgery. Int Wound J. 2016; 13:(5)759-762 https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12369

Cafarotti1 S, Condoluci A, Inderbitzi R. Physiology and pathophysiology of the pleura. In: Kiefer T (ed). Cham: Springer; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32339-8_2

Modified application of vacuum-assisted closure in thoracic surgery patients

01 April 2022

Abstract

Objective:

Surgical site infection (SSI), ranging from superficial, deep and to organ space, is one of the major predictors for morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Care to accelerate SSI healing is taken to shorten hospital stay and reduce costs. The deep application of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) in thoracic patients is not well established in the literature. In this study, the deep application and safety of VAC therapy in patients with various thoracic pathologies was evaluated.

Method:

A retrospective chart review of all patients who were admitted to the thoracic surgery service between July 2014 and July 2018 and who developed deep SSI was carried out.

Results:

A total of 12 patients were included, and their demographic data analysed. There were various thoracic pathologies complicated with postoperative deep SSI treated with VAC. The duration of VAC application ranged from 4–40 days with an average hospital stay of 37.6 days. All patients showed clinical, radiological and microbiological improvement rather than developing complications except for one case of mortality due to septicaemia.

Conclusion:

In this study, partial intrapleural VAC therapy was safe for use in patients who underwent thoracic surgery, regardless of the underling pathology, with caution (i.e., with continued monitoring of the patient's tolerance to the treatment). The overall hospital stay may be reduced with the use of VAC. It also decreased perioperative morbidity, secondary to wound infection.

Surgical site infection (SSI), ranging from superficial, deep and to the organ space, is one of the major predictors for morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Care to accelerate SSI healing is taken to shorten the patient's hospital stay and to reduce costs. The application of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) into the pleural space in thoracic patients is not well established in the literature.1 It is believed that VAC is a revolution in the management of SSI. It is a special form of local therapy that uses negative pressure.

In this study, the use and safety of a VAC device and its deep application in patients with various thoracic pathologies were examined, and our experience of introducing part of the VAC system into the pleural space described.

A retrospective chart review for all patients who were admitted under thoracic surgery in a university hospital in Saudi Arabia between July 2014 and July 2018, and who developed an SSI. Patients were excluded if they had a superficial SSI, were paediatric patients, patients in whom VAC was applied in the non-thoracic area (such as the abdomen) and patients who had prophylactic application of VAC (V.A.C GRANUFOAM SILVER dressings, 3M+KCI, US).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Journal of Wound Care's Silk Road Supplement and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for healthcare professionals across Asia. To read more, please register today.